<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emory Creates New Copyright Specialist Position</title>
	<link>http://efc.blogsome.com/2006/11/30/emory-creates-new-copyright-specialist-position/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Lori</title>
		<link>http://efc.blogsome.com/2006/11/30/emory-creates-new-copyright-specialist-position/#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://efc.blogsome.com/2006/11/30/emory-creates-new-copyright-specialist-position/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>Given the profuse volume of rhetoric alleging 'defensive medicine,' now we have 'defensive librarianship.'  The key difference, of course, is that civil complaint law is now a struggle of the Goliath vs. David, rather than vice versa, assuming it ever was.  It may be well worth pointing out that the rhetoric of so-called tort reform is quite behind the times.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Given the profuse volume of rhetoric alleging &#8216;defensive medicine,&#8217; now we have &#8216;defensive librarianship.&#8217;  The key difference, of course, is that civil complaint law is now a struggle of the Goliath vs. David, rather than vice versa, assuming it ever was.  It may be well worth pointing out that the rhetoric of so-called tort reform is quite behind the times.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
