<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Emory Free Culture Comments</title>
	<link>http://efc.blogsome.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Lori</title>
		<link>http://efc.blogsome.com/2006/11/30/emory-creates-new-copyright-specialist-position/#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://efc.blogsome.com/2006/11/30/emory-creates-new-copyright-specialist-position/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>Given the profuse volume of rhetoric alleging 'defensive medicine,' now we have 'defensive librarianship.'  The key difference, of course, is that civil complaint law is now a struggle of the Goliath vs. David, rather than vice versa, assuming it ever was.  It may be well worth pointing out that the rhetoric of so-called tort reform is quite behind the times.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Given the profuse volume of rhetoric alleging &#8216;defensive medicine,&#8217; now we have &#8216;defensive librarianship.&#8217;  The key difference, of course, is that civil complaint law is now a struggle of the Goliath vs. David, rather than vice versa, assuming it ever was.  It may be well worth pointing out that the rhetoric of so-called tort reform is quite behind the times.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CreditSage</title>
		<link>http://efc.blogsome.com/2007/03/17/resolution-in-support-of-the-federal-research-public-access-act-of-2006/#comment-13</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:00:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://efc.blogsome.com/2007/03/17/resolution-in-support-of-the-federal-research-public-access-act-of-2006/#comment-13</guid>
					<description>It's a real problem for any college student to get a hold of all that scholarly literature.  And how can one srudy without it?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s a real problem for any college student to get a hold of all that scholarly literature.  And how can one srudy without it?!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Web Marketing Mentor</title>
		<link>http://efc.blogsome.com/2007/03/17/resolution-in-support-of-the-federal-research-public-access-act-of-2006/#comment-12</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:04:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://efc.blogsome.com/2007/03/17/resolution-in-support-of-the-federal-research-public-access-act-of-2006/#comment-12</guid>
					<description>Cool CC t-shirt, where did you get it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Cool CC t-shirt, where did you get it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stevan Harnad</title>
		<link>http://efc.blogsome.com/2007/03/17/resolution-in-support-of-the-federal-research-public-access-act-of-2006/#comment-8</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://efc.blogsome.com/2007/03/17/resolution-in-support-of-the-federal-research-public-access-act-of-2006/#comment-8</guid>
					<description>Dear Brian:

Student support for FRPAA is a terrific idea. Could I make a few suggestions?

(1) The FRPAA is basically a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eprints.org/signup/fulllist.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Green OA Self-Archiving Mandate&lt;/a&gt;. That means it requires researchers funded by the agencies to make their articles OA by depositing them in their &lt;a href=&quot;http://roar.eprints.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Institutional Repository&lt;/a&gt;.
Here are some of &lt;a href=&quot;http://roar.eprints.org/index.php?action=search&amp;amp;query=georgia&amp;amp;submit=Search&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Emory&lt;/a&gt;'s and &lt;a href=&quot;http://roar.eprints.org/index.php?action=search&amp;amp;query=florida&amp;amp;submit=Search&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Florida&lt;/a&gt;'s repositories:

(2) Charity (and OA!) begins at home.

(3) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arl.org/sparc/advocacy/frpaa/highered.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;132 university provosts&lt;/a&gt; have signed in support of FRPAA (not Emory or U. Fla. yet!)

(4) Universities need not wait for FRPAA to be adopted in order to adopt a &lt;a href=&quot;http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/71-guid.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Green OA mandate of their own&lt;/a&gt;.

(5) Students could be even more effective if they lobbied their own universities to (i)support FRPAA and (ii) mandate Green OA for their own university.

(6) Your case for OA will be the strongest if you give *all* the reasons OA is so important: (i) peer to peer access, so researchers can use, apply, and build upon one another's research findings, for the benefit of the tax-payers who funded the research; (ii) student access, so the next generation of researchers and users can be trained on current research findings; (iii) developing world access, so poorer countries can access and build on US research findings; (iv) public access, so tax-payers can access the research findings they have paid for.

(&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/21.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Green OA&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, by the way, means making research freely accessible by depositing it in an OA repository; &quot;Gold OA&quot; means publishing it in an OA journal. Green OA needs to come before Gold OA, and that is what the FRPAA Green OA mandate is for.)


Best wishes,

Stevan Harnad
&lt;a href=&quot;http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html
&quot;&gt;American Scientist Open Access Forum&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dear Brian:</p>
	<p>Student support for FRPAA is a terrific idea. Could I make a few suggestions?</p>
	<p>(1) The FRPAA is basically a <a href="http://www.eprints.org/signup/fulllist.php" rel="nofollow">Green OA Self-Archiving Mandate</a>. That means it requires researchers funded by the agencies to make their articles OA by depositing them in their <a href="http://roar.eprints.org/" rel="nofollow">Institutional Repository</a>.<br />
Here are some of <a href="http://roar.eprints.org/index.php?action=search&amp;query=georgia&amp;submit=Search" rel="nofollow">Emory</a>&#8217;s and <a href="http://roar.eprints.org/index.php?action=search&amp;query=florida&amp;submit=Search" rel="nofollow">Florida</a>&#8217;s repositories:</p>
	<p>(2) Charity (and OA!) begins at home.</p>
	<p>(3) <a href="http://www.arl.org/sparc/advocacy/frpaa/highered.html" rel="nofollow">132 university provosts</a> have signed in support of FRPAA (not Emory or U. Fla. yet!)</p>
	<p>(4) Universities need not wait for FRPAA to be adopted in order to adopt a <a href="http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/71-guid.html" rel="nofollow">Green OA mandate of their own</a>.</p>
	<p>(5) Students could be even more effective if they lobbied their own universities to (i)support FRPAA and (ii) mandate Green OA for their own university.</p>
	<p>(6) Your case for OA will be the strongest if you give *all* the reasons OA is so important: (i) peer to peer access, so researchers can use, apply, and build upon one another&#8217;s research findings, for the benefit of the tax-payers who funded the research; (ii) student access, so the next generation of researchers and users can be trained on current research findings; (iii) developing world access, so poorer countries can access and build on US research findings; (iv) public access, so tax-payers can access the research findings they have paid for.</p>
	<p>(&#8221;<a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/21.html" rel="nofollow">Green OA</a>&#8220;, by the way, means making research freely accessible by depositing it in an OA repository; &#8220;Gold OA&#8221; means publishing it in an OA journal. Green OA needs to come before Gold OA, and that is what the FRPAA Green OA mandate is for.)</p>
	<p>Best wishes,</p>
	<p>Stevan Harnad<br />
<a href="http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html<br />
">American Scientist Open Access Forum</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://efc.blogsome.com/2006/09/09/25/#comment-5</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 03:33:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://efc.blogsome.com/2006/09/09/25/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>FreeCulture.org can host your wiki if you can't get one running at your school... We have multiple Mediawiki installs and wouldn't mind another one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>FreeCulture.org can host your wiki if you can&#8217;t get one running at your school&#8230; We have multiple Mediawiki installs and wouldn&#8217;t mind another one.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://efc.blogsome.com/2006/05/01/itunes-u/#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 18:11:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://efc.blogsome.com/2006/05/01/itunes-u/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>Hey folks, could you please truncate that long URL?  It looks bad on your own site, and it's also screwing up the front page of FreeCulture.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey folks, could you please truncate that long URL?  It looks bad on your own site, and it&#8217;s also screwing up the front page of FreeCulture.org.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
